Connect with us

Breaking News Emails

Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.

By Associated Press

LOS ANGELES — Lawyers for President Donald Trump want porn actress Stormy Daniels to pay them $340,000 in legal bills they claim they earned successfully defending Trump against her frivolous defamation claim.

The attorneys are due in a Los Angeles federal courtroom Monday to make their case that they rang up big bills because of gamesmanship and aggressive tactics by attorney Michael Avenatti, who represents Daniels.

Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, alleges she had a one-night affair with Trump in 2006. She sued him earlier this year seeking to break a non-disclosure agreement she signed days before the 2016 election about the tryst as part $130,000 hush money settlement. Trump has denied the affair.

Despite the deal to stay quiet, Daniels spoke out publicly and alleged that five years after the affair she was threatened to keep quiet by a man she did not recognize in a Las Vegas parking lot. She also released a composite sketch of the mystery man.

She sued Trump for defamation after he responded to the allegation by tweeting: “A sketch years later about a nonexistent man. A total con job, playing the Fake News Media for Fools (but they know it)!”

U.S. District Court Judge S. James Otero ruled in October that Trump’s statement was “rhetorical hyperbole” against a political adversary and was protected speech under the First Amendment. Trump is entitled to legal fees, Otero said.

Trump’s team of lawyers have accounted for more than 500 hours of work — at rates as high as $840 an hour.

Avenatti, who has positioned himself as a Trump foe and is considering a run for president in 2020, said the fees are “staggering and grossly inflated” and should not exceed $25,000.

Trump’s lead attorney said the fees and unspecified monetary sanctions were earned because of the extraordinary nature of the case.

“This action is virtually unprecedented in American legal history,” attorney Charles Harder wrote. Daniels “not only brought a meritless claim for defamation against the sitting president of the United States, but she also has engaged, along with her attorney, in massive national publicity.”

Harder noted she appeared on national TV, penned a book and went on a live strip club tour dubbed “Make America Horny Again” — a riff on Trump’s “Make America Great Again” slogan.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

UH OH: EU's 'MONSTER' eyes role as Brexit trade negotiator – and will 'GO HARD' on UK

Published

on

JEAN-CLAUDE Juncker’s Brexit-hating former deputy is reportedly seeking to become the EU’s next Brexit negotiator – and could use the position to strong-arm the UK in trade talks.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

END OF UK? Scottish independence support SOARS amid no deal Brexit fears – shock poll

Published

on

ALMOST 60 percent of Scots believe it would be better for their country to gain independence rather than remain in the UK after a no-deal Brexit, a new poll has indicated.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Not enough evidence against Trump yet for impeachment

Published

on

Breaking News Emails

Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.

By Ben Kamisar

WASHINGTON — Maine independent Sen. Angus King, cautioned Democrats in Congress Sunday that there’s not enough public evidence at this point to impeach President Donald Trump without the issue devolving into partisan warfare.

“I don’t think that there’s evidence yet available to the public where there would be more or less a consensus that this is an appropriate path,” King said in an appearance on “Meet the Press.”

“My concern is that if impeachment is moved forward on the evidence that we have now, at least a third of the country would think it was just political revenge and a coup against the president,” said the senator, who caucuses with Democrats. “That wouldn’t serve us well at all. The best way to solve a problem like this, to me, is elections.”

King added that, as a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, he’s privy to additional information about special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation that’s not available to the public. And he said that Congress needs to be careful that it doesn’t set a strictly partisan standard on an issue as important as impeachment.

“I’m a conservative when it comes to impeachment. I think it’s a last resort and only when the evidence is clear of a really substantial legal violation,” he said.

“We may get there, but we are not there now.”

King’s comments come after a rough week for Trump, particularly as it relates to Mueller’s investigation into possible collusion between the president’s campaign and Russia during the 2016 election.

Last week, federal prosecutors accused Trump of directing his former lawyer, Michael Cohen to commit campaign finance felonies regarding hush-money payments to two adult film entertainers who claim they had affairs with Trump years ago.

Cohen also admitted that he lied to Congress about his discussions with Trump and his family members about a plan to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

In a possible preview of GOP opposition to any impeachment effort, Kentucky Republican Sen. Rand Paul argued that the special counsel’s investigation has been overly broad to begin with.

He said that prosecutors have “over-criminalized” possible campaign finance violations related to Cohen’s hush-money payments.

Paul argued that Mueller’s agreements with Cohen and former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn could be proof of “prosecutorial abuse” that has pressured Trump allies into finding something to provide to the special counsel in exchange for a lighter sentence.

And he downplayed the idea that Trump seeking to build a Trump Tower in Russia while running for president was a problem.

“If you were asking and saying ‘I will give you something in exchange for letting us build a hotel, that would be wrong. But i haven’t heard any evidence of that,” the Kentucky senator said.

“Just trying to build a hotel somewhere, I can’t imagine how that would be criminal or why you’d lie about it.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending