Connect with us

The pay packets of the U.K.’s top bosses have attracted criticism after a new report revealed the stunning disparity between the average British worker and a typical FTSE 100 CEO.

Labeled “Fat Cat Friday”, January the 4th has been identified as the date by which the average CEO of a blue-chip British firm company collects the same annual take-home pay of a typical full-time worker in the U.K.

The figures collated by the High Pay Centre thinktank and the professional HR body the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) revealed that last year the average FTSE 100 CEO was paid £1,020 per hour or £3.926 million ($5 million) for the year.

Over calendar 2018, share values of the average FTSE 100 company decreased by more than 12 percent.

The calculations said top UK bosses now earned 133 times more than the average worker and that a CEO who works a 12-hour day would have earned the median £29,574 of British staff by Friday 4th 2019.

A Director of the High Pay Centre, Luke Hildyard, said: “Corporate boards are too willing to spend millions on top executives without any real justification, while the wider workforce is treated as a cost to be minimised.”

The report added that excessive pay and the business culture of “Superstar” CEOs is increasingly being recognised as a failure of corporate governance adding that there was a “myth of super talent” that was used to justify high pay.

Peter Cheese, chief executive of the CIPD, said in a statement Friday the bumper pay packages awarded by remuneration committees represented “a significant failure in corporate governance.”

An umbrella federation of most trade unions in England and Wales, The Trades Union Congress (TUC), took to Twitter to express anger and call for “radical change.”

Despite the outrage, the difference in pay packets is still far smaller than for some firms in the United States. In the U.S., public companies are now required to disclose their companies’ pay ratios between the CEOs and median employees.

For example, in a filing made in September 2018, it was revealed that the Co-CEOs of Oracle, Mark Hurd and Safra Catz, each took home $108 million in the fiscal 2018 year.

Oracle’s median employee pay packet, the point at which there is exactly half of all employees either earning more or less, was $89,887 for the same time period. That works out an at CEO pay ratio of 1,205 to 1.

And in the online study by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations, the widest disparity in an S&P 500 company is at the toymaker Mattel where CEO Margaret H. Georgiadis took home $31,275,289 for fiscal 2018. The median worker pay of the firm during the same period was $6,013.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

World

Apple lays off over 200 from Project Titan autonomous vehicle group

Published

on

In August 2018, Apple enlisted a Tesla engineering vice president and Apple veteran, Doug Field, to lead the Titan team alongside Bob Mansfield. This week’s dismissals from the group were seen, internally, as anticipated restructuring under the relatively new leadership.

Other employees who were impacted by the restructuring of Project Titan are staying at Apple, but moving to different parts of the company.

Of late, Apple CEO Tim Cook has touted his company’s initiatives in health as the key to its future growth. “I believe, if you zoom out into the future, and you look back, and you ask the question, “What was Apple’s greatest contribution to mankind?” it will be about health,” Cook told CNBC’s Jim Cramer.

Source link

Continue Reading

World

shares jump despite disappointing earnings

Published

on

Company Vice President Sean Kim said the memory demand slowdown would be bigger than expected into the first half of 2019 due to China’s economic slowdown and the U.S.-China “trade situation,” according to Reuters.

Kim’s comments came days after China announced that the country’s economic growth in 2018 was its slowest in nearly three decades. At the same time, Beijing and Washington are attempting to strike a deal amid an ongoing trade dispute which has seen the two largest economies in the world slap billions of dollars worth of tariffs on each other’s goods.

Some analysts were not surprised by the earnings report from SK Hynix.

“(The) results were as expected,” Daniel Yoo, head of global strategy at Kiwoom Securities, told CNBC in an email.

However, he warn that both SK Hynix and its rival Samsung were likely to see their operating profit for the first two quarters of 2019 coming in “less than half of last year’s record high(s).”

Yoo’s sentiments were echoed by Sanjeev Rana, a senior analyst at CLSA.

“I think we have a little bit more pain to go for the next two quarters,” Rana told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” on Thursday.

Source link

Continue Reading

World

Huawei CFO extradition could be complicated: ex-US ambassador to China

Published

on

“Whenever a chief executive starts to voice his or her thoughts on the case, that’s a huge additional complication for the prosecution,” Baucus added. “In this case, it’s President Trump’s statement with respect to the Meng case … it makes it harder for the prosecution to get the extradition.”

Earlier this week, Canadian newspaper Global and Mail reported that the U.S. has told Canada it will formally request for Meng’s extradition — though no timeline was specified.

For its part, China has demanded the U.S. drop the extradition request. According to Canada, Beijing detained more than a dozen of its citizens after Meng’s arrest.

Baucus warned that if the U.S. extradition request is granted, it would have a major impact on the U.S.-China relationship.

The world’s two largest economies had been embroiled in a trade war in recent months, which roiled markets and sparked concerns over the health of the global economy. Late last year, Beijing and Washington agreed to a temporary pause on applying new tariffs in order to work out a mutually agreeable trade deal.

Huawei is one of China’s largest companies. The U.S. government has for years taken issue with the tech giant over its alleged espionage ties to the Chinese government and has accused the company of intellectual property theft.

— Reuters and CNBC’s Kate Fazzini contributed to this report.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending