Connect with us

Breaking News Emails

Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.

By James Rainey and Phil Helsel

Controlled burns have been put on hold. Fire training sessions have been canceled. The hiring of hundreds of seasonal firefighters has been delayed.

The nation’s wildland fire service — trying to regroup this winter after two of the biggest and deadliest fire seasons on record — has instead been cast into a state of anxiety by the three-week-old partial government shutdown. That’s because some firefighters with the Forest Service, National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management are among the approximately 800,000 government employees either furloughed or working without a guarantee of pay.

The shutdown has affected hundreds of regular fire and support personnel at those agencies, along with seasonal “hotshots” and others who swell the fire lines during the forest and brush fire emergencies that have swept through the West with increasing intensity nearly every summer and fall, according to wildfire experts. A Senate Appropriations Committee report estimates that as many as 5,000 Forest Service firefighters may be working without pay.

Analysts say the sidelining of some firefighters comes at a difficult time because of the increasing length and arduousness of the fire calendar. After battling what was then the largest fire in California history in 2017, the Thomas Fire, and the deadliest fire in California history in November, the Camp Fire, firefighters do not appreciate going untrained and unpaid.

A member of the Bureau of Land Management Silver State Hotshot crew from Elko, Nevada, walks through a burn operation on the southern flank of the Rim Fire near Yosemite National Park on Aug. 30, 2013.Mike McMillan / U.S. Forest Service via AP file

“Folks in the fire and land management agencies place a high value on the mission,” said Jim Whittington, a more than 20-year employee with the Forest Service, Park Service and Bureau of Land Management, who became a consultant in 2017. “They signed up and are passionate about public lands, public safety and doing the right thing. To them, this shutdown is a real kick in the pants.”

Some furloughed employees see an additional irony because the shutdown has delayed fire mitigation and training at a time when President Donald Trump has attacked California for poor forest management. But Whittington said most of his former co-workers are determined not to get involved in politics.

“We have seen three or four tweets on wildland fires and all of them have been met with raised eyebrows and some sense of disbelief in the wildland fire community,” Whittington said of Trump’s Twitter posts. “But we have lots of Republicans and lots of Democrats in our world. We have hippies and cowboys and hunters and poets. When we come together, we don’t care about any of that political stuff. We are all working together on whatever incident we are on.”

Regional forest officials in the West either did not answer their phones this week or referred calls to the service’s parent agency in Washington, the U.S. Department of Agriculture. A spokeswoman there said an official shutdown plan has been put in place, ensuring that workers “essential to protect life and property” remain on duty.

“Preparing fire responders for the nation’s 2019 fire suppression is part of the Forest Service shutdown plan,” Katie O’Connor, a Forest Service spokeswoman, said in a statement. “The agency is committed to supporting activities such as temporary and permanent fire hiring … and some essential trainings that are critical to 2019 fire suppression. These activities are prioritized because if the agency does not proceed we will jeopardize invested resources and risk not having permanent or temporary fire personnel on board and qualified to complete work later in the year.”

The Forest Service does not have an “accurate number” of employees put on furlough, O’Connor said. But those who work closely with federal fire officials said that damage already is being done.

Controlled and so-called pile burns to rid the forests of flammable underbrush and debris have been put on hold since the government shut down. These fires either burn debris and small trees in prescribed areas or burn heaps of wood chips, pine cones and branches collected by forest workers during the summer.

One planned burn on private land in southwest Colorado that had been set for late December was called off because federal workers could not attend to assist, said Danny Margoles, coordinator for the Dolores Watershed Resilient Forest Collaborative, which brings together government, industry and conservation groups. The burn will be rescheduled, Margoles said.

U.S. Forest Service members watch a firefighting helicopter fly over remote terrain during the 2017 Whittier Fire in Santa Barbara County.EPA file

A proposal to thin trees and burn brush in California’s Stanislaus National Forest also may not happen, because Tuolumne County and Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions, a group of forest stakeholders, couldn’t get needed information from the Forest Service to complete a grant application, said John Buckley, executive director of an environmental group in the state who is part of the leadership team with Yosemite.

The Forest Service’s 10-page shutdown contingency plan allows completion of prescribed burns already underway but says there should be no new prescribed burns until the government reopens.

More fire mitigation work needs to be done in national forests, not less, said Buckley, adding: “And now, in 2019, less work is likely to be done unless this is resolved quickly.”

Nick Goulette, executive director of the Watershed Center, a forestry nonprofit in California, said that there is a backlog of tens of thousands of piles of forest debris that need to be burned in the state. But there were too few workers to get the job done, even before the shutdown, he said.

“The U.S. Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service and National Forest Service essentially don’t have their personnel on the ground,” Goulette said. “And so they are not doing the mitigation work they typically do this time of year.”

With federal employees off the job, training programs like a wildland fire workshop set for Missoula, Montana, in late January have been canceled, said Bill Gabbert, a longtime firefighter who now runs a blog about wildfires.

The winter is normally a time for numerous other training sessions, from basic safety courses, which every firefighter must repeat annually, to sophisticated tactical simulations. Federal employees either manage or participate in many of those sessions, which now have been cast into doubt, several fire professionals said.

The Forest Service memo allows “critical fire training academies currently in session to prepare fire responders for the nation’s 2019 fire suppression and emergency response needs.” It does not make clear if trainings not already begun can remain on the calendar.

Although the Forest Service statement said critical hiring would go on unabated, one federal employee and an online posting suggested that a hiring event this week in South Dakota was put off because of the shutdown. The Forest Service’s Region 2 “fire hire,” covering Colorado, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and most of Wyoming, was delayed, according to information posted on Facebook by the U.S. Hotshots Association, a group that represents seasonal firefighters.

New firefighters must pass a drug test and a physical, in addition to training, before they can be hired. Any slowdown in the hiring process “is a little scary because it could limit who is available,” said one Forest Service employee, who declined to be named because she was not authorized to speak on the issue.

“If you don’t do the hiring on time, then you can’t do the training on time, then you are not ready for the next fire season,” said Goulette of the Watershed Center, which is based in the Northern California town of Hayfork. “And with fire season expanding in California and across the West, you better be ready. Spring does not last as long as it used to.”

Fire experts and climate scientists say warmer and drier weather has prolonged recent fire seasons, making winter recovery time even more precious for firefighters to regroup. “There can be a little over 300 days a year now that someone is fighting a fire somewhere,” said Whittington, “compared to 200 or 250 days in the past. So the time to get over the last fire year and prepare for the next one is incredibly short.”

The new attention comes at a time when wildfires have pushed to the forefront of the public’s consciousness after 2017 wildfires blackened a huge swath of Ventura and Santa Barbara counties and burned into several wine country communities. That was only a prelude to 2018’s Woolsey and Camp Fires, the latter burning about 14,000 homes and killing 86 people.

Even before this fall’s fires, the California Legislature was putting together a bill that calls for $1 billion for fire management over the next five years. The state also established in a Fire Management Task Force. But some of the federal employees who participate in that joint planning have been missing since late December because of the shutdown.

Firefighters already survived a 2018 fire season of 14-hour days, two weeks at a time, often sleeping on the ground. The stress of the work is considerable, and anxiety has now increased as some paychecks have been put on hold and many employees have been forced to borrow to make ends meet, said another Forest Service employee, who asked to be anonymous because she was not authorized to speak.

“The biggest thing about the shutdown is the extra stress it’s bringing and the impact it’s having on how people feel about the job,” Whittington said. “Morale is not very good, and it’s tough to bring that back. …This should be down time, so this is not a good deal at all.”



Source link

Politics

Ricky Martin slams ‘religious liberty’ bill. Puerto Rico governor backs down.

Published

on

Puerto Rico Gov. Ricardo Rosselló backed down from a “religious liberty bill” after international star Ricky Martin published an open letter Thursday slamming the legislation that would exempt government employees from serving constituents if they believe it clashes with their religious beliefs.

“As a defender of human rights and a member of the LGBTT community, I am vehemently opposed to the proposed measure imposed upon us under the guise of religious freedom,” the Puerto Rican artist wrote, that “projects us to the world as a backwards country.”

Hours after the letter was published, Rosselló asked legislators to shelve the bill, saying in a statement that “instead of reaching a consensus on a basis of mutual respect, it provokes the division of our people.”

His petition came just minutes after island senator Zoe Laboy said she was “determined to submit a negative report to the project of religious freedom before the members of the commission that I preside over for its evaluation.”

Martin’s letter came a day after he took to social media to speak out against Rosselló and the island’s House of Representatives, who had voted in favor of the bill Tuesday.

“The House Bill 2069, filed at the request of Governor Ricardo Rosselló and promoted by Representative Charbonier, is nothing more than opening the door to hatred towards anyone who does not share the same ideology, who belongs to the LGBTT community, or that is not even the same skin color, among so many other discriminatory manifestations,” Martin wrote on Twitter in Spanish.

The bill has sparked fierce outcry in the island from civil rights and LGBTQ actvists, and at least three U.S. Democratic presidential candidates — Julián Castro, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders — have voiced their opposition to the legislation.

“We must defeat this bill — and work to end discrimination, rather than give it shelter,” Castro, the only Latino running for president, said.

New York Democratic congresswoman Nydia Velázquez, who is from Puerto Rico, has also decried the measure.

Supporters of the bill, including the governor, say that the government cannot discriminate and has “the obligation to always provide public services to all its citizens.” Still, the bill calls for government employees and employers to “seek reasonable accommodations” in the face of “foreseeable future conflict.”

Rosselló had said Wednesday that he would only sign the controversial bill if Puerto Rican lawmakers approve another bill that would ban conversion therapies in Puerto Rico.

But this legislation has also been slammed by civil rights groups since it only bans conversion therapies conducted by mental health professionals while allowing the practice to continue in churches and by parents of a minor.

In the wake of the controversy, Rosselló asked legislators Thursday to also withdraw this bill.

The governor had already issued the controversial conversion therapy ban under an executive order March 27, and that will still stand even though it doesn’t become law.

Martin’s social media posts, which he published just three days after leading the 62nd National Puerto Rican Day Parade, motivated more artists and politicians to publicly condemn the bill.

Grammy-winning Puerto Rican musician René Pérez Joglar, also known as Residente Calle 13, said on Instagram that the law makes Puerto Rico “look bad on an international level, like a retrograde country.”

“This does no good to tourism, on the contrary. This is a shame,” the artist added.

“This movement is not representative of the Puerto Rico that we all love, defend and hold so dear. We call on the Senate, the House and Governor Ricardo Rosselló to reject this effort, which is an open door to hatred and discrimination,” Martin said in his letter.

FOLLOW NBC LATINO ON FACEBOOK, TWITTER AND INSTAGRAM.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Boris Johnson height: How tall is Boris Johnson – How much weight has he lost?

Published

on

BORIS JOHNSON has come out on top in the first round of ballots, and three MPs have been knocked out of the race to become Tory leader. But how tall is the would-be Prime Minister?

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Change UK forced to switch name AGAIN becoming ‘The Independent Group for Change’

Published

on

CHANGE UK has been forced to switch its name for a second time following the threat of legal action, now applying to become known as The Independent Group for Change.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending