By Nicole Acevedo
Sixteen months after Hurricane Maria ravaged Puerto Rico, residents like Tati Morales in the Cercadillo neighborhood of Cayey, Puerto Rico are still struggling to get reliable access to potable water, phone service and a secure home.
“We almost have no lighting in our public roads, risking accidents,” said Morales. “The infrastructure in general is still very weak — many streets in our neighborhood collapsed and they’re still like that.”
Morales said she hopes the reports that President Donald Trump could use $2.5 billion set aside to finance reconstruction projects in the island to pay for a U.S.-Mexico border wall are “really some sort of publicity and that is not going to become a reality.”
The alternative is too alarming.
“It’s barbarous and another way to hit us,” she said in Spanish. “What more can we take?”
Like other communities across the island, residents in Cercadillo have been working with nonprofits trying to rebuild before hurricane season starts this summer.
With the help of nonprofit organizations, they’re building some homes for elders who lost their houses and families have invested in having access to water tanks, generators and other necessities in order to be better prepared in the case of another disaster.
“This kind of work continues and it’s a long road,” said Morales.
Part of that reconstruction work is set to be financed with more than $20 billion in federal funds assigned to help Puerto Rico revamp its electrical grid and home inventory. Puerto Rico has not received most of the federally-approved funds yet.
Puerto Rican officials in the U.S. and the island — from both sides of the political spectrum — blasted the administration over the possibility.
“It would be appalling for the President to take money from places like Puerto Rico that have suffered enormous catastrophes, costing thousands of American citizens lives, in order to pay for Donald Trump’s foolish, offensive and hateful wall,” said Rep. Nydia Velázquez, D-N.Y. in a statement. “Siphoning funding from real disasters to pay for a crisis manufactured by the President is wholly unacceptable and the American people won’t fall for it.”
Puerto Rico’s non-voting member of Congress Jenniffer González Colón, who leans Republican, explicitly rejected “that game with our pain and hopes” and said she “will not support the reallocation of funds, which we approved in a bipartisan effort in Congress for the recovery and reconstruction of Puerto Rico.”
“The humanitarian crisis on the southern border of the United States, identified by both President Obama and President Trump, can not be resolved by removing money approved for disaster mitigation in Puerto Rico at the expense of the poorest American citizens, treated with total inequality,” González Colón said in a statement.
Puerto Rico’s governor, Ricardo Rosselló said there was “no justification” for reclassifying the money.
“If anything, the conversation should be how we get more resources to rebuild those impacted areas faster,” Rosselló said via Twitter. “No wall should be funded on the pain and suffering of US citizens who have endured tragedy and loss through a natural disaster.”
For over a year, Trump and his administration have been criticized over their response to Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico.
In the immediate aftermath of the storm, over 200,000 Puerto Ricans left for the mainland — some temporarily — and Puerto Rico incurred about $90 billion in damages.
When President Trump first visited the disaster area in Oct. 2017, he said that Puerto Rico was not a “real catastrophe” like Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.
Months later, a study commissioned by the Puerto Rican government revealed that at least 2,975 people died in Puerto Rico from the effects of Hurricane Maria — including a lack of electricity, impassable roads and a scarcity of medications and other provisions — making it the deadliest natural disaster in the U.S. in 100 years.
Trump has not yet publicly acknowledged or mourned the victims of the deadly catastrophe following the revised figures.
Federal government offices such as FEMA acknowledged agency failures in areas such as staffing and coordination in an after-action report, while agencies like HUD allocated historic amounts of funding for the island in the area of housing, infrastructure and energy — but most of the money has not made its way to communities in need.
Velázquez and other members of Congress, including Rep. José Serrano, D-N.Y., vowed to fight back against any efforts to divert relief funds for the wall.
“I wish I could say this is unbelievable, but this is sadly in keeping with Donald Trump’s disregard for Puerto Rico and for Latinos. Stealing from the recovery effort to fund the wall is beyond reprehensible. As an appropriator, I’ll do everything in my power to stop it,” said Serrano on Twitter.
Boris Johnson children: How old are Boris Johnson’s children? Will they be at TV debate?
BORIS JOHNSON is topping the Tory leadership race after receiving 114 votes in the first ballot last week and will be hoping to keep his lead during the second vote on Tuesday. But who are the former Foreign Secretary’s children and how old are they?
Supreme Court denies Flint officials’ request to block lawsuit over water crisis
WASHINGTON — Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Friday denied a request from four Flint, Michigan officials who asked the U.S. Supreme Court to block lower court rulings that said they could be sued over lead contamination in the water supply.
Their motion was directed to Justice Sotomayor, who handles such appeals from that region. Without explanation, as is the usual practice, she denied their request.
The officials involved in the water crisis argued that they should be immune from a liability suit brought by a Flint woman, Shari Guertin, who said she and her minor daughter suffered injuries from drinking and bathing in water contaminated with lead. After a federal judge refused to throw the lawsuit out, the officials appealed.
A three-judge panel ruled against them in January, saying the officials “created the Flint Water environmental disaster and then intentionally attempted to cover up their grievous decision.” The full Sixth Circuit declined last month to take the case, leaving the panel decision intact.
The four asked the Supreme Court Thursday to put a hold on those rulings, which would have blocked the lawsuits while they pursued a full-blown Supreme Court appeal. It is that request that Justice Sotomayor denied.
The civil lawsuit is separate from any criminal cases. On Thursday, Michigan prosecutors dropped all pending charges against a group of state and local officials accused of a variety of crimes arising from the water crisis.
World1 week ago
Kazakhstan election incites violent protest in Nur-Sultan, Almaty
World6 days ago
My skateboard career is the bravest thing I’ve done
Politics1 week ago
Economy added just 75,000 jobs in May, amid trade tensions and global economic slowdown
Latest News1 week ago
Border patrol agent saves woman and son from thousand of bees | US News
World1 week ago
Raytheon and United Technologies agree to all-stock merger of equals
World1 week ago
Trump plays risky game by weaponizing tariffs
Politics1 week ago
House will call spy hunters to testify about Trump campaign, Russia contacts
Latest News6 days ago
Climate change helping ‘make world less peaceful’, Global Peace Index says | World News