Connect with us

Breaking News Emails

Get breaking news alerts and special reports. The news and stories that matter, delivered weekday mornings.

 / Updated 

By Rebecca Shabad, Frank Thorp V, Alex Moe and Garrett Haake

WASHINGTON — Negotiations over funding for border security were stalled as the week began, with top appropriators from both parties huddling Monday to try to overcome the latest sticking point ahead of the Friday night deadline to avoid another government shutdown.

Top Democratic appropriators Rep. Nita Lowey of New York and Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont met behind closed doors with their Republican counterparts, Rep. Kay Granger of Texas and Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, on Monday afternoon on Capitol Hill, and were slated to meet again Monday evening.

Despite apparent progress last week, talks stalled over the weekend. The current sticking point in the negotiations is not over a barrier on the nation’s southern border — it’s over the number of detention beds for undocumented immigrants who enter the country.

“I’m hoping we can get off the dime later today or in the morning because time is ticking away,” Shelby, who’s leading negotiations as part of a bipartisan, bicameral conference committee, said on “Fox News Sunday.” “We got some problems with the Democrats dealing with ICE, that is detaining criminals that come into the U.S. and they want a cap on them. We don’t want a cap on that.”

“I think the next 24 hours are crucial,” Shelby added during the Sunday morning interview.

A senior Democratic aide told NBC News on Sunday that Senate Republicans would need to accept “limits” on Trump immigration policies in the form of a cap on the bed count: “A deal that includes new physical barriers must all include limits on the number of ICE detention beds. If Senate Republicans won’t compromise with us on both, we can’t reach a deal.”

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said Monday that the Democrats’ demand would be a “total nonstarter with the White House.

“House Democrats decided to add a poison-pill demand into the conversations at the 11th hour. It’s a new demand. It’s extreme: A hard, statutory cap on the number of illegal immigrants who could be detained by the federal government,” he said. “This is a poison pill that no administration — not this one, not the previous one — would or should ever accept.”

Democrats “don’t want to give us the beds,” President Donald Trump said Monday during a meeting at the White House with a group of sheriffs.

“These are people, they kidnap people. These are people the Democrats want to come into our society. I don’t think so,” he said. “I don’t know, maybe we’re in a different country than I know of.”

Democrats say they don’t want more detention beds because they think the more humane policy is to allow asylum-seekers and other immigrants without criminal records to be released while they await their immigration proceedings.

In a letter sent to negotiators during the last round of talks in January, the White House Office of Management and Budget requested $4.2 billion for 52,000 beds, $798 million more than current funding levels.

Democrats are proposing a cap of 16,500 detention beds.

“A cap on ICE detention beds will force the Trump administration to prioritize deportation for criminals and people who pose real security threats, not law-abiding immigrants who are contributing to our country,” Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif., chairwoman of the Homeland Security Appropriations subcommittee and a member of the conference committee, said in a statement Sunday.

A cap on detention beds, a House Democratic aide said, would also rein in the Trump administration’s agenda on deportations.

Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, the former Senate majority whip, said on Twitter Monday that the Democratic demand was “arbitrary, and will allow criminals to rove the homeland freely. Rs believe some undocumented immigrants who commit crimes in the U.S. shouldn’t be subject to a cap.”

Rep. Dan Kildee of Michigan, the Democratic Caucus chief deputy whip, was asked Monday on CNN if drawing a line on the bed count issue would be worth risking another government shutdown.

“All I can say is, this is a priority for us,” he responded. “The issue that we’ve been raising is the number of beds that are available, forcing the administration to prioritize the use of those beds, which we naturally believe would force them to be used for actual people who may present some risk or danger.”

White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, who hosted several members of Congress at Camp David over the weekend, said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday that the White House “absolutely cannot” rule out another government shutdown.

“Let’s say the hard-core left wing of the Democrat Party prevails in this negotiation and they put a bill on the president’s desk with, say, zero money for the wall, or $800 million, an absurdly low number. How does he sign that?” he said.

Republicans are starting to discuss the idea of proposing a one-year continuing resolution that would keep funding at current levels, but it’s not clear that Democrats, who control the House, would accept that, and it’s unclear if President Trump would sign it.

Trump tweeted Sunday that negotiations were going poorly. “The Border Committee Democrats are behaving, all of a sudden, irrationally. Not only are they unwilling to give dollars for the obviously needed Wall (they overrode recommendations of Border Patrol experts), but they don’t even want to take muderers [sic] into custody! What’s going on?”

The president planned to hold a Make America Great Again rally in El Paso, Texas on Monday and deliver what he described on Twitter earlier in the day as a “Big speech on Border Security and much else.”

Heidi Przybyla contributed.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Brexit a ‘huge opportunity’ for UK farmers to rid themselves of EU regulations – Tory MP



BREXIT will present British farmers with a “huge opportunity” to smash into new markets and benefit from the latest agricultural innovations, a Tory MP has claimed.

Source link

Continue Reading


Diane Abbott promises to campaign for Remain to rid UK of ‘Brexit shambles’



DIANE ABBOTT has pledged to campaign for Remain in a second Brexit referendum in order to end the “Brexit shambles”.

Source link

Continue Reading


Trump snubs John McCain during bill signing intended to honor him



WASHINGTON — Congress wanted to honor the ailing Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. President Donald Trump did not.

In extended remarks during a visit to Fort Drum in upstate New York to sign the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 — this year’s version of an annual bill that sets defense policy — Trump chose not to mention the former prisoner of war and Senate Armed Services Committee chairman who is battling brain cancer. He even omitted McCain’s name when citing the title of the bill.

The two men have long been fierce critics of each other, with McCain calling Trump’s supporters “crazies” in 2015 and Trump retaliating by questioning whether McCain, who was subjected to torture in a Vietnamese prison camp, is really a “war hero” because “he was captured.”

The snub at Fort Drum, home to the combat aviation brigade of the Army’s 10th Mountain Division, did not escape the notice of McCain’s allies.

“For those asking did I expect Trump to be an a—— today. No more than I expected it to be Monday,” Mark Salter, McCain’s longtime aide, wrote on Twitter.

McCain’s condition — dire enough that a recent HBO documentary on him was titled “John McCain: For Whom the Bell Tolls” — has not stopped Trump from deriding the Arizona senator at political rallies. Though Trump does not use his name, he tells crowds that he would have been able to repeal Obamacare if not for a thumbs-down sign from one senator — McCain.

The senator’s own statement included Trump’s name in the headline and in a preamble written by staff. But the words attributed to McCain did not.

“I’m very proud that the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 has been signed into law,” he said.

Source link

Continue Reading