Connect with us

First lady Melania Trump slammed a witness in the House Judiciary Committee impeachment hearing on Wednesday, saying she should be “ashamed” about a quip involving her son, Barron.

The witness, Pamela Karlan, later said she was sorry.

“A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics,” the first lady tweeted of her 13-year-old son. “Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it.”

The tweet was later added into the official record by Republicans at the impeachment hearing.

Vice President Mike Pence also weighed in, calling the joke “a new low” while speaking at an event in Michigan.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

“The Democrats should be ashamed. Enough is enough,” Pence said. “This sham impeachment should end.”

Karlan later said at the hearing: “I want to apologize for what I said earlier about the president’s son. It was wrong of me to that. I wish the president would apologize, obviously, for the things he’s done that’s wrong, but I do regret having said that.”

Karlan, one of four law professors to testify before the panel, had referenced the Trump’s youngest son while noting that presidents aren’t kings. She said the Founding Fathers included impeachment in the Constitution to ensure leaders can be held accountable.

“The Constitution doesn’t allow titles of nobility,” Karlan testified. “The president can name his son Barron, but he can’t make him a baron.”

The wordplay got laughs from the audience in the hearing room, but Karlan was later chastised for the line by Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, a close ally of the president’s.

“When you invoke the president’s son’s name here, when you try to make a little joke out of referencing Barron Trump, that does not lend credibility to your argument,” Gaetz told her. “It makes you look mean. It makes you look like you’re attacking someone’s family, the minor child of the president of the United States.”

The White House’s Twitter account later tweeted out video of Gaetz’s dressing down of Karlan. “Democrats are calling as witnesses the kind of people who would name the minor child of the president as a punchline in a committee hearing,” the tweet said.

White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham also pounced on the Stanford Law School professor, tweeting that the joke was a “classless move.” “And what’s worse, it’s met by laughter in the hearing room. What is being done to this country is no laughing matter,” she wrote.

Donald Trump Jr. sounded off on Twitter as well. “That a 13 year old is fair game for partisan hacks on a national platform shows you all you need to know about the new left and who is now running the ship,” he wrote.

Another prominent conservative, lawyer and Trump critic George Conway, who is married to presidential aide Kellyanne Conway, offered a different take.

“Which side is making a fever-pitched big deal out of the rhetorical play on the words ‘Barron’ and ‘baron’? That tells you who’s making the president’s son an issue and who has reached a desperate new low,” he tweeted.



Source link

Politics

Trump claims he doesn’t know Prince Andrew, but once called him ‘a lot of fun’

Published

on

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump has claimed that he does not know Prince Andrew, but a recently resurfaced interview with People from 2000 says otherwise, showing Trump describing Andrew as “a lot of fun to be with.”

“He’s not pretentious. He’s a lot of fun to be with,” Trump told People in 2000, speaking of Andrew. The article also states that Trump and Andrew, as well as Trump’s then-girlfriend Melania Knauss, had “chatted” at a Halloween costume party hosted by Heidi Klum in New York City in 2000.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

The republished article from People contradicts Trump’s claims from just a day earlier that he does not know Andrew.

“I don’t know Prince Andrew, but it’s a tough story,” Trump said on Tuesday while attending the annual NATO meeting in London. “I don’t know him, no.”

Andrew, a member of the British royal family and formerly known as the Duke of York, was forced to withdraw from his royal duties after a disastrous television interview with the BBC in which he tried to defend his past friendship with sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, who killed himself inside a federal jail cell in August.

A U.S. woman has said she was trafficked by Epstein to Andrew when she was 17. The legal age of consent in the United Kingdom is 16. Andrew has denied the allegations.

Trump has previously claimed he does not know somebody when they become politically dangerous to be connected to. In November, Trump claimed he did not know Gordon Sondland, his ambassador to the European Union, after Sondland gave an unfavorable testimony in the House impeachment inquiry.

The resurfaced quotes from People are the latest revelations that Trump might have been social with Andrew and Epstein on multiple occasions prior to his entrance into presidential politics.

Trump was photographed with Andrew at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in February of 2000 with Melania, who is now the first lady. The prince and the president also met during Trump’s official visit to the United Kingdom in June and were photographed touring Westminster Abbey together.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Election 2019 candidates: How to find out YOUR candidates for elections? Who are they?

Published

on

ELECTION 2019 is now just one week away, with millions of UK residents ready to go to the polls in a decisive vote next Thursday. How can you find out who your local candidate is?

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Legal scholars in plain English

Published

on

The House Judiciary Committee held its first impeachment hearing Wednesday, with four eminent legal scholars debating whether President Donald Trump’s dealings with Ukraine constituted impeachable offenses.

The three scholars called to testify by Democrats — Pamela Karlan, a professor at Stanford Law School and a former Justice Department official in the Obama administration; Noah Feldman, a professor at Harvard Law School; and Michael Gerhardt, a professor at the University of North Carolina School of Law — overwhelmingly concluded that the evidence against Trump showed he had committed impeachable actions. The one scholar called by Republicans — Jonathan Turley, of the George Washington University School of Law — took issue with the hurried process of the inquiry.

Along the way, there was talk of originalism, the Founding Fathers, King George III and the Secret Treaty of Dover. Oh, and someone used the word “necromancy.”

Here are the 10 most important lines from Wednesday’s hearing — in plain English.

1. “High crimes and misdemeanors”

“On the basis of the testimony and evidence before the House, President Trump has committed impeachable high crimes and misdemeanors by corruptly abusing the office of the presidency,” Feldman said.

2. “Abuse of power”

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

“When President Trump invited — indeed, demanded — foreign involvement in our upcoming election, he struck at the very heart of what makes this country the ‘republic’ to which we pledge allegiance,” Karlan said. “Drawing a foreign government into our election process is an especially serious abuse of power because it undermines democracy itself.”

3. Trump “doubled down” in violating Constitution

“Based on the evidentiary record, what has happened in the case before you is something that I do not think we have ever seen before: a president who has doubled down on violating his oath to ‘faithfully execute’ the laws and to ‘protect and defend the Constitution,'” Karlan said.

4. A compelling metaphor

“Imagine living in a part of Louisiana or Texas that’s prone to devastating hurricanes and flooding. What would you think if, when your governor asked the federal government for the disaster assistance that Congress has provided, the president responded: ‘I would like you to do us a favor. I’ll meet with you and send the disaster relief once you brand my opponent a criminal’?” Karlan said. “Wouldn’t you know in your gut that such a president had abused his office, betrayed the national interest and tried to corrupt the electoral process?”

5. A list of the possible charges

“The record compiled thus far shows that the president has committed several impeachable offenses, including bribery, abuse of power in soliciting a personal favor from a foreign leader to benefit his political campaign, obstructing Congress and obstructing justice,” Gerhardt said.

6. Turley objects on obstruction, pace of inquiry

“The record does not not establish obstruction in this case,” Turley said. He also said that “if the House proceeds solely on the Ukrainian allegations, this impeachment would stand out among modern impeachments as the shortest proceeding, with the thinnest evidentiary record, and the narrowest grounds ever used to impeach a president.”

7. Nadler pushes lack of precedence

“Never before, in the history of the republic, have we been forced to consider the conduct of a president who appears to have solicited personal, political favors from a foreign government,” House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., said. “Never before has a president engaged in a course of conduct that included all of the acts that most concerned the Framers.”

8. Nadler compares Clinton’s cooperation to Trump’s lack thereof

“In 1998, President Clinton physically gave his blood. President Trump, by contrast, has refused to produce a single document and directed every witness not to testify,” Nadler said.

9. “A waste of time”

“This is not an impeachment. This is a simple railroad job. And today is simply a waste of time,” Rep. Doug Collins of Georgia, the ranking Republican on the committee, said.

10. If not this, then what?

“If what we are talking about is not impeachable, nothing is impeachable,” Gerhardt said.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending